מיכאל אלחדד

Word embedding vectors are used as input for a variety of tasks. Choosing the right model and features for producing such vectors is not a trivial task and different embedding methods can greatly affect results. In this paper we repurpose the "Pyramid Method" annotations used for evaluating automatic summarization to create a benchmark for comparing embedding models when identifying paraphrases of text snippets containing a single clause. We present a method of converting pyramid annotation files into two distinct sentence embedding tests. We show that our method can produce a good amount of testing data, analyze the quality of the testing data, perform test on several leading embedding methods, and finally explain the downstream usages of our task and its significance.