מירב מימון טייב

אקדמי בכיר

Minimum and comfortable driving headways

Reality versus perception

A field study was conducted to evaluate drivers' actual headways in car-following situations, their relationship to the drivers' brake reaction times, and their relationship to the drivers' ability to estimate those headways using different metrics. Drivers were asked to maintain "minimum safe distance" and "comfortable, normal distance with no intention to pass" behind the car ahead. The lead car speeds varied from 50 to 100 km/hr. The results showed that under both sets of instructions, drivers adjusted their distance headways in relation to speed, maintaining constant time headways. A significant portion of the drivers maintained time headways that are considered unsafe in relation to drivers' reaction times. There was no significant relationship between the minimal headways maintained by the drivers and their brake reaction times under conditions of maximum attention and preparedness to apply brakes. Accuracy of spoken estimates of headways varied widely among the three measures used to report perceived headway; meters and car lengths yielded much lower estimates (and ones closer to the actual headways) than did seconds. The results have implications for headway perception, driving safety, driver education, and smart cruise-control design.

שפת פרסום אנגלית
דפים 159-172
כתב עת Human Factors
כרך 43
נושא מספר 1
סטטוס פרסום פורסם - 01.01.2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Human Factors and Ergonomics
Applied Psychology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
גישה למסמך
10.1518/001872001775992543
קבצים וקישורים אחרים
Link to publication in Scopus