Yuval Elovici

Senior Academic

How to ensure bad quality in metal additive manufacturing

In-situ infrared thermography from the security perspective

Andrew Slaughter, Mark Yampolskiy, Manyalibo Matthews, Wayne E. King, Gabe Guss, Yuval Elovici

Additive Manufacturing, a.k.a. 3D Printing, is increasingly used to manufacture functional parts, including components of safety critical systems. therefore, assuring part quality has become of paramount importance. In-situ infrared (IR) imaging systems are a promising solution to increase final build quality and minimize time-consuming and costly post processing and characterization. However, it also raises novel security concerns. We argue that, if compromised, the same in-situ quality control can be abused to sabotage manufactured parts. As a basis for our discussion, we first detail how IR thermography is used in open-loop and, experimentally, in closed-loop quality control for powder bed fusion (PBF) systems. We then identify malicious manipulations that an adversary can perform. We discuss the consequences of the manipulations on the manufactured part's quality. For selected attacks, we also provide experimental proof of the identified manipulations and their consequences.

Publication language English
Publication status Published - 29.08.2017
a78

Keywords

Additive manufacturing
Infrared thermography
Powder bed fusion
Sabotage
Safety
Security
Tampering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Software
Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computer Networks and Communications

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Access to Document
10.1145/3098954.3107011
Other files and links
Link to publication in Scopus