Yoav Tsori

Our communication [1] had two errors in the values of the parameters cited in two figures. The errors do not alter the figure data or conclusions of the communication. (1) In all four panels of Fig. 1, the value of the surface charge density was wrongly stated as σ = 1 nm². The right value is σ = − 1 nm². The corrected figure appears here. (2) In the caption of Fig. 4, there was an error in the calculation parameters. The charge density was not set in the calculation and the value of the pore size (D = 10 nm) was missing. The correct figure caption is this: The temperature shift Δt^⁎ as a function of the wall potential ψ_s for a hydrophobic pore and different values of Δu^±. Here t = 0.96, a²Δγ = − 0.4, and D = 10 nm. Lines are a guide to the eye.