Home PublicationsContact
Chatgpt Image Jun 3, 2026, 12 15 16 PM

The Lab for Social Decision-Making & Risk

Prof. Yoella Bereby-Meyer

Compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines

Active vs. passive risk takers

Ruty Keinan, Tali Idan, Yoella Bereby-Meyer

In 2020, most countries around the world adopted various measures aimed at combating the coronavirus (i.e., COVID-19), or reducing risky behavior which may spread the virus. In the current study (N = 215), we examined compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines using a risk-taking perspective, differentiating active from passive risk taking. In the corona context active risk taking involves actions that may cause disease contraction, such as shaking hands, while passive risk taking involves the acceptance of risk brought on by inaction, as in not using an alco-gel disinfectant. We found that personal tendencies for passive and active risk taking predicted passive and active corona related risk taking, respectively. Furthermore, compliance with COVID-19 prevention measures was also related to differences in self-control, with low Initiation self-control predicting passive corona risk taking and low levels of Inhibition self-control predicting active corona risk taking. Thus, while not complying with Covid-19 prevention measures put people at risk, differentiating between active and passive risks is helpful for accurate prediction of each type of risk behavior.

Publication language English
Pages 20-35
Volume 16
Issue number 1
Publication status Published - 01.01.2021

Keywords

Compliance
COVID-19
Passive risk
Self-control
Time perspective

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Decision Sciences
Applied Psychology
Economics and Econometrics
Other files and links
Link to publication in Scopus