Search
Search

Noam Tirosh

Senior Academic

Nationalizing the “refugee crisis”

A comparative analysis exploring how elite newspapers in four countries framed forced migration during World Refugee Day

Noam Tirosh, Steve Bien-Aime, Akshaya Sreenivasan, Dennis Lichtenstein

This comparative study examines framing of migration-related stories (focused on media coverage of World Refugee Day [WRD]) between four countries, and framing developments over 18 years, specifically if (and how) the 2015 peak “refugee crisis” altered news coverage of refugee issues. Elite newspapers, the New York Times (USA), the Times of India, Sueddeutsche Zeitung (Germany) and Haaretz (Israel) were content analyzed. Newspapers gave only sparse attention to WRD itself, but WRD was a “temporal opportunity” to discuss migration that increased coverage. But the 2015 peak refugee crisis had little effect on coverage over the long run.

Publication language English
Pages 47-64
Volume 43
Issue number 1
Publication status Published - 01.03.2022

Keywords

World Refugee Day
content analysis
framing
global journalism
international comparison
migration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Communication

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
Access to Document
10.1177/07395329211050123
Other files and links
Link to publication in Scopus