Search
Search

Iris Tabak

Senior Academic

Functional scientific literacy

Disciplinary literacy meets multiple source use

Lab coats and microscopes, rather than keyboards and word processors, and experimentation and discovery, rather than composition and rhetoric, are what people tend to associate with scientists and scientific work (Van Gorp, Rommes, and Emons, 2014). Yet, the production of scientific knowledge occurs as much through the selection and arrangement of prose as through the choice of variables and their manipulation (Latour, 1981). Literacy practices are inherent to scientific activity (Bazerman, 1988; Neuwirth and Contijoch, 2003; Yarden, Norris, and Phillips, 2015). This is true for lay as well as professional engagement with science, and science communication plays a key role in public engagement with science (Bromme and Goldman, 2014; National Science Board, 2016).

Publication language English
Pages 221-237
Publication status Published - 01.01.2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Social Sciences

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Access to Document
10.4324/9781315627496
Other files and links
Link to publication in Scopus